Evaluasi Program Sentra Latihan Olahragawan Muda Potensial Nasional Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Authors

  • Masaji Dirgantara Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Hijrin Fithroni Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Heri Wahyudi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Abdul Aziz Hakim Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47861/jkpu-nalanda.v2i1.846

Keywords:

Program Evaluation, SLOMPN UNESA, CIPP, National Sports Grand Design

Abstract

The Ministry of Youth and Sports established a program for fostering young athletes which was named the Design of the National Sports Advisory Board (DBON), which currently has four centers spread across four universities on the island of Java. The centers in the DBON program are given the Sentra Latihan Olahragawan Muda Potensial Nasional. In this program the coaching carried out is long-term coaching which is targeted for the 2032 Olympics, Brisbane, Australia. This research only focuses on the Surabaya State University's National Potential Young Athlete Training Center, which currently has 3 (three) sports branches and has a total of 24 athletes from all over Indonesia. In the development of the SLOMPN program, it is necessary to periodically evaluate progress. This research method uses a descriptive qualitative research method with the chosen research design being the CIPP model developed by Stufflebeam. Evaluation uses the CIPP model, consisting of elements: context, input, process, and product. This method has been validated by sports science experts. The sample is part of the population taken by the researcher for research. The samples taken in this study consisted of 3 (three) coaches from swimming, archery, and taekwondo, 1 (one) school representative who was the homeroom teacher, and 6 (six) athletes from swimming, archery, and taekwondo. Taekwondo. The results of the research show that the process of fostering achievement and academic achievement at SLOMPN Surabaya State University in terms of context, input, process, and product only requires a little team evaluation and improvement as well as additions to existing facilities and infrastructure. The results of the study also found obstacles regarding athlete, coach and support staff decisions which made there was no definite clarity for athletes, coaches and support staff. The conclusion of this study shows that the entire process of running the Surabaya State University SLOMPN program has been going well, but there still needs to be improvements starting from team coordination, repair and addition of infrastructure and the need for decrees aimed at athletes, coaches and support staff.

Author Biographies

Hijrin Fithroni, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

 

 

Heri Wahyudi, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

 

 

References

Arikunto, J. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Bumi Aksara. http://senayan.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=8777&keywords=

Bailey, R. P., Collins, D., Ford, P. A., MacNamara, A´ ., Pearce G., & Toms, M. (2010). Participant development in sport: An academic literature review. Sports Coach UK.

Balyi, I., Hamilton, A. (2004). Long-Term Athlete Development: Trainability in children and adolescents. Windows of opportunity. Optimal trainability. National Coaching Institute.

Ford, P., de Ste Croix, M., Lloyd, R., Meyers, R., Moosavi, M., Oliver, J., Till, K., & Williams, C. (2011). The Long-Term Athlete Development model: Physiological evidence and application. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.536849

Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale: Development, reliability and validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146

Hasan, A., Yasin, S. N. T. M., & Yunus, M. F. M. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Mechatronics Curriculum Using Stufflebeam CIPP Evaluation Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(July), 844–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.324

Mohebbi, N., Akhlaghi, F., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Khoshgam, M. (2011). Application of CIPP model for evaluating the medical records education course at master of science level at Iranian medical sciences universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3286–3290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.287

Muharram, N. (2016). Evaluasi Program Latihan Fisik Sepakbola Menggunakan Metode CIPP. Jurnal Efektor, 3(1), 36–44.

Powell, B., & Conrad, E. (2015). Utilizing the CIPP Model as a Means to Develop an Integrated Service-Learning Component in a University Health Course. Journal of Health Education Teaching, 6(1), 21–33.

Pribadi, B. A. (2014). Desain dan Pengembangan Program Pelatihan Berbasis Kompetensi (1st ed.). Prenadamedia Group.

Rahayu, S. (2022). DBON, Kawah Candradimuka Atlet Indonesia Menuju Olimpiade 2032. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/sports/read/2022/11/22/09533298/dbon-kawah-candradimuka-atlet-indonesia-menuju-olimpiade-2032

Rojali, W. I., Ngadiman, N., Budi, D. R., Nurcahyo, P. J., & Febriani, A. R. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Daring Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga dan Kesehatan SMA Pada Era Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal MensSana, 6(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.24036/menssana.06012021.24

Setya Rahayu, Toto Subroto, Dimyati, Rahmat Hermawan, F. N. S. (2014). Jurnal IPTEK Olahraga lisma.pdf. In Core.Ac.Uk. Kementrian Pemuda dan Olahraga Republik Indonesia. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/298024951.pdf

Sudjana, D. (2006). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah Untuk Pendidikan Nonformal dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sukardi. (2015). Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip dan Operasionalnya (Y. S. Hayati (ed.); 1st ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Urs Granacher, & Ron Borde. (2019). Effects of Sport-Specific Training during the Early Stages of Long-Term Athlete Development on Physical Fitness, Body Composition, Cognitive, and Academic Performances. Frontiers in Physiology, 8(OCT), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00810

Usra, M. (2013). PROGRAM EVALUATION OF SRIWIJAYA STATE SPORT SCHOOL. The Journal of Educational Development, 1(JED), 106–113.

Yüksel, İ. (2010). How to Conduct a Qualitative Program Evaluation in the Light of Eisner’s Educational Connoisseurship and Criticism Model. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 1(2), 78–83. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjimcyI3vD3AhUZn44IHT9KDygQFnoECDgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.eric.ed.gov%2Ffulltext%2FED537765.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3VoXoPqtxh4F7mOlD_71DK

Yusuf, F. (2008). Evaluasi program dan instrumen evaluasi untuk program pendidikan dan penelitian. Rineka Cipta.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-29

How to Cite

Masaji Dirgantara, Hijrin Fithroni, Heri Wahyudi, & Abdul Aziz Hakim. (2024). Evaluasi Program Sentra Latihan Olahragawan Muda Potensial Nasional Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Umum, 2(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.47861/jkpu-nalanda.v2i1.846

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.