Masa Bimbingan Apakah Berpengaruh Terhadap Pembentukan Karakter Mahasiswa

Authors

  • Shofya Azzahra Muttaqin Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
  • Wilda Zahrotul Hasanah Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
  • Farid Abdul Wahid Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
  • Aditia Nugraha Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
  • Muhammad Zafharani El-Shabaz Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
  • Rama Wijaya Abdul Rozak Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
  • Ariyano Ariyano Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47861/jkpu-nalanda.v1i3.269

Keywords:

Guidance period for students, good influence, inhibiting factors

Abstract

Guidance Period activities which are considered ineffective, are examined to find out how good they are for students, so that they become a material for consideration and reference for evaluating these activities in subsequent years. Reviewed by giving questionnaires to several respondents with special criteria, and observed through naturalistic observation methods. It was found that the frequency of the influence of the guidance period on several aspects, namely: 1) time management, 2) comply with regulations, 3) be ethical, 4) be responsible, the average agree: 86.6% and disagree: 13.3%. Meanwhile, in the observation results, it was found that the behavior of some respondents did not match the answers to the questionnaire which was influenced by several factors, namely internal factors in the form of individuals and external factors in the form of education and the environment. It is hoped that the inhibiting factors on the effect of the Guidance Period activities found through this research can be the basis for increasing the good habits of respondents and improving these activities so that they become better.

References

Silvia, Y. 2015. Deskripsi Pengaruh Masa Orientasi Tahun 2014 Pada Pembentukan Karakter Positif Mahasiswa Semester II Akademi Keperawatan RS PGI Cikini. Jurnal. Akademi Keperawatan Husada Karya Jaya.

Prakosa, A. 2018. Wacana Tanpa Ospek, UNAS Sambut Mahasiswa Baru Lewat Character Building. Analisis Wacana Kritis pada Berita. Universitas Nasional Jurusan Ilmu Komu- nikasi.

Elwindra, Barsasella. 2014. Survei Kepuasan Maha- siswa terhadap Pelaksanaan Pelatihan ESQ 165 pada Orientasi Studi dan Pengenalan Kampus (Ospek) STIKes PHI. Jurnal. Persada Husada Indonesia.

Utomo, p. 2012. Ospek dan Pengembangan Budaya Akademik. Memberi Bobot Arah Orientasi Pembinaan Mahasiswa. UNY.

Tayyeb, M. Memahami Dampak Tindakan Sosial Mahasiswa Senior Terhadap Mahasiswa Jun- ior Dalam Kampus. Universitas Negeri Ma- kasar.

Pramono D, Ristiono H dan Bhakti C. 2019. Model Program Pengenalan Kampus Untuk Mengembangkan Kesiapan Karir Mahasiwa. Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.

Wulan T, Fadhillah I. 2020. Peran Pendidik dalam Pengembangan Identitas Diri Mahasiswa melalui Character Building. Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri.

Sanaky, H. 2011. Masa Orientasi Siswa/Mahasiswa sebagai Media Oeientasi Pendidikan tanpa Kekerasan. El-Tarbawi.

Susanti, R. 2013. Penerapan Pendidikan Karakter di Kalangan Mahasiswa. Jurnal. Al-Ta’lim. STKIP Abdi Pendidikan Payakumbuh.

Sudrajat, A. 2011. Mengapa Pendidikan Karakter?. Jurnal. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-19

How to Cite

Shofya Azzahra Muttaqin, Wilda Zahrotul Hasanah, Farid Abdul Wahid, Aditia Nugraha, Muhammad Zafharani El-Shabaz, Rama Wijaya Abdul Rozak, & Ariyano Ariyano. (2023). Masa Bimbingan Apakah Berpengaruh Terhadap Pembentukan Karakter Mahasiswa. Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Umum, 1(3), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.47861/jkpu-nalanda.v1i3.269

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.