Analisis Terkait Justice Collaborator Sebagai Faktor Yang Meringankan Sanksi Pidana Richard Eliezer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47861/khirani.v1i2.243Keywords:
Criminal Justice System, Existence, Urgency, Justice CollaboratorAbstract
The focus of this research is the factors that might be considered by judges when granting criminal sanction relief to a Justice Collaborator. Second, how does the application of Justice Collaborator affect criminal cases in Indonesia and what are the impacts. In this study, the approach method used is normative juridical research method. The results of the study show that there are several regulations in Indonesia that regulate Justice Collaborators in the criminal justice system, but they have not been regulated in detail in the Criminal Procedure Code. Justice Collaborators have an important existence and urgency in the criminal justice system, especially in the stages of investigation, examination, prosecution and execution of decisions.
References
Sambas, Nandang & Andriasari. (2013) Dian. Telaah Kritis Terhadap Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Kejahatan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Makalah disampaikan pada Call for Paper Simposium MAHUPIKI tanggal 18-19 Maret 2013.
Wijaya, Firman. (2012). Whiste Blower dan Justice Colaborator dalam Perspektif Hukum. Penaku.
Echos, Jhon M.. & Shadilli, Hassan. (2005). Kamus Inggris-Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia
Ranuhandoko, I.P.M.. (2003). Terminologi Hukum Inggris Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Pasal 340 KUHP tentang “Pembunuhan yang direncanakan terlebih dahulu”
Pasal 55 KUHP tentang “penyertaan dalam suatu delik”.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung RI No. 04 Tahun 2011.
