The Implementation of Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) in The 7th Grade English Class Within Merdeka Curriculum at SMP Negeri 5 Tulungagung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47861/jdan.v2i2.1179Keywords:
CTL Learning, English, Independent CurriculumAbstract
This study aims to the implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) learning conducted and applied by teachers in the seventh grade English subject at SMP Negeri 5 Tulungagung. The subject of this research is the seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 5 Tulungagung. The object of this research is the implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) learning in English subjects. Data collection techniques were observation and interview. Data analysis used qualitative analysis and to check the validity of the data using triangulation techniques. This research is included in qualitative research. The results showed that the implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) applied by teachers in seventh grade English subjects at SMP Negeri 5 Tulungagung has been going well. In the learning process in class, teachers always start by providing stimulation and motivation to learn. Forming class groups carried out by the teacher makes students more active and not quickly bored in following the learning process. In the learning process, students are also given games and interactive learning media to motivate them to always be enthusiastic about learning.
References
Anggraini. (2017). Pengaruh lingkungan belajar dan disiplin belajar terhadap hasil belajar kompetensi keahlian elektronika industri di sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan.
Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik (p. 172). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. http://r2kn.litbang.kemkes.go.id:8080/handle/123456789/62880
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of qualitative research.
Haryanto, P. C. (2019). The application of contextual teaching and learning in natural science to improve student’s HOTS and self-efficacy. Physics: Conference.
Hosnan, M. (2016). Psikologi perkembangan peserta didik. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Jusuf. (2010). Evaluation is a process of assessing the progress, growth, and development of students for educational purposes.
Kunandar. (2011). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of learning method contextual teaching learning (CTL) for increasing learning outcomes of entrepreneurship education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 17(3), 37–46.
Mandasari, M., Syarif, H., & Refnaldi, R. (2019). Elicitation techniques in classroom interaction used by English teachers at SMAN 1 2x11 Kayutanam. Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24036/komposisi.v20i1.10036
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Surakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Rahardjo, M. (2010). Triangulasi dalam penelitian kualitatif.
Rusman. (2011). Konsep dasar teknologi informasi. Medium.com, 1–22. http://rusmantp.wordpress.com
Sabil, H. (2018). Penerapan pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (CTL) untuk meningkatkan disposisi matematis siswa kelas VIII A SMP N 2 Pulung. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v8i2.5511
Sanjaya, W. (2005). Strategi pembelajaran berbasis standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Sanjaya, W. (2013). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran: Teori dan praktik pengembangan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: PT.
Sears. (2003). Introduction to contextual teaching and learning. Bloomington, IN: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Shodiq, A., & Ihsan, A. (2017). The effectiveness of contextual teaching and learning to improve achievement in basic grammar class at Kampung Inggris Language Center Pare Kediri. Proceedings on Social Sciences and Humanities, 1–4. http://proceedings.ui.ac.id/index.php/uipssh/article/view/61/105
Sudijono, A. (2012). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprihatiningrum, J. (2023). Strategi pembelajaran teori & aplikasi.
Suyadi. (2015). Strategi pembelajaran pendidikan karakter. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Trianto, M. P. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif. Jakarta: Kencana.
Trianto. (2010). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Trisniawati, T. (2015). Pembelajaran kontekstual (contextual teaching and learning) pada bangun ruang sisi datar di sekolah dasar. Trihayu, 1(3), 259045. https://www.neliti.com/publications/259045/
Widoyoko, E. P. (2010). Evaluasi program pembelajaran.
Yaelasari, M., & Yuni Astuti, V. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka pada cara belajar siswa untuk semua mata pelajaran (Studi kasus pembelajaran tatap muka di SMK INFOKOM Bogor). Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(07), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v3i07.1041
Yesya, D. P., Desyandri, & Alwi, E. (2018). Pengaruh penggunaan model contextual teaching and learning (CTL) dalam pembelajaran PKn di sekolah dasar. E-Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran SD, 6(1), 1–10.
Yusutria, Y., & Febriana, R. (2019). Aktualisasi nilai–nilai kemandirian dalam membentuk karakter mandiri siswa. Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 577–582. https://doi.org/10.29313/tjpi.v8i1.4575
